Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

A comparison of random sequence reads versus 16S rDNA sequences for estimating the biodiversity of a metagenomic library

Abstract : The construction of metagenomic libraries has permitted the study of microorganisms resistant to isolation and the analysis of 16S rDNA sequences has been used for over two decades to examine bacterial biodiversity. Here, we show that the analysis of random sequence reads (RSRs) instead of 16S is a suitable shortcut to estimate the biodiversity of a bacterial community from metagenomic libraries. We generated 10,010 RSRs from a metagenomic library of microorganisms found in human faecal samples. Then searched them using the program BLASTN against a prokaryotic sequence database to assign a taxon to each RSR. The results were compared with those obtained by screening and analysing the clones containing 16S rDNA sequences in the whole library. We found that the biodiversity observed by RSR analysis is consistent with that obtained by 16S rDNA. We also show that RSRs are suitable to compare the biodiversity between different metagenomic libraries. RSRs can thus provide a good estimate of the biodiversity of a metagenomic library and, as an alternative to 16S, this approach is both faster and cheaper.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-03252249
Contributor : Lionel Frangeul <>
Submitted on : Monday, June 7, 2021 - 3:52:31 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 30, 2021 - 4:04:00 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Wednesday, September 8, 2021 - 7:12:41 PM

File

gkn496.pdf
Publication funded by an institution

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Chaysavanh Manichanh, Charles Chapple, L. Frangeul, Karine Gloux, Roderic Guigo, et al.. A comparison of random sequence reads versus 16S rDNA sequences for estimating the biodiversity of a metagenomic library. Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press, 2008, 36 (16), pp.5180-5188. ⟨10.1093/nar/gkn496⟩. ⟨pasteur-03252249⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

15

Files downloads

46