A. Vm and . Pjg, Performed the experiments Analyzed the data: ALP KA MLQ. Wrote the paper, Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments

N. Bhuiyan, F. Qadri, A. Faruque, M. Malek, and M. Salam, Use of Dipsticks for Rapid Diagnosis of Cholera Caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 from Rectal Swabs, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol.41, issue.8, pp.3939-3941, 2003.
DOI : 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3939-3941.2003

F. Nato, A. Boutonnier, M. Rajerison, P. Grosjean, and S. Dartevelle, Onestep immunochromatographic dipstick tests for rapid detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 in stool samples, Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, vol.10, pp.476-478, 2003.

P. Kalluri, A. Naheed, S. Rahman, M. Ansaruzzaman, and A. Faruque, Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests for cholera: does the skill level of the technician matter?, Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol.79, issue.1, pp.49-55, 2006.
DOI : 10.1128/CDLI.10.3.476-478.2003

X. Wang, M. Ansaruzzaman, R. Vaz, C. Mondlane, and M. Lucas, Field evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic dipstick test for the diagnosis of cholera in a high-risk population, BMC Infectious Diseases, vol.6, issue.1, p.17, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.4780060402

J. Harris, E. Cavallaro, A. De-nobrega, S. Dos, J. Barrado et al., Rapid Dipstick test for cholera during a cholera outbreak in Guinea-Bissau, Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol.83, issue.9, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02335.x

P. Mukherjee, S. Ghosh, T. Ramamurthy, M. Bhattacharya, and R. Nandy, Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic dipstick kit for diagnosis of cholera emphasizes its outbreak utility, Jpn J Infect Dis, vol.63, pp.234-238, 2010.

A. Branscum, I. Gardner, and W. Johnson, Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol.68, issue.2-4, pp.145-163, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.12.005

C. Enoe, M. Georgiadis, and W. Johnson, Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol.45, issue.1-2, pp.61-81, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00117-3

E. Garrett, W. Eaton, and S. Zeger, Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach, Statistics in Medicine, vol.135, issue.9, pp.1289-1307, 2002.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.1105

D. Limmathurotsakul, K. Jamsen, A. Arayawichanont, J. Simpson, and L. White, Defining the True Sensitivity of Culture for the Diagnosis of Melioidosis Using Bayesian Latent Class Models, PLoS ONE, vol.2, issue.8, p.12485, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0012485.s005

A. Page, K. Alberti, A. Guenole, V. Mondongue, and M. Lonlas, Use of Filter Paper as a Transport Medium for Laboratory Diagnosis of Cholera under Field Conditions, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol.49, issue.8, pp.3021-3023, 2011.
DOI : 10.1128/JCM.00514-11

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-01135902

A. Dodin and J. Fournier, Diagnosis of the cholera vibrio Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of cholera vibrio and other vibrios, pp.59-82, 1992.

K. Hoshino, S. Yamasaki, A. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, and A. Basu, O1 and O139, FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, vol.20, issue.3, pp.201-207, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01128.x

D. Brenner, A. Mcwhorter, J. Knutson, and A. Steigerwalt, Escherichia vulneris: a new species of Enterobacteriaceae associated with human wounds, 1982.

D. Spiegelhalter, A. Thomas, N. Best, and W. Gilks, BUGS: Bayesian Inference Using Gibbs Sampling Available, 1996.

M. Alam, N. Hasan, M. Sultana, G. Nair, and A. Sadique, Diagnostic Limitations to Accurate Diagnosis of Cholera, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol.48, issue.11, pp.3918-3922, 2010.
DOI : 10.1128/JCM.00616-10

A. Gelman and D. Rubin, Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences, Statistical Science, vol.7, issue.4, pp.457-511, 1992.
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1177011136

N. Dendukuri, P. Belisle, and L. Joseph, Bayesian sample size for diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard: Comparing identifiable with non-identifiable models, Statistics in Medicine, vol.16, issue.2, pp.2688-2697, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/sim.4037