Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol.5, issue.4, pp.464-470, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00229-5
The Role of Chemogenomics in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Drug Development Research, vol.4, issue.7, pp.357-364, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1002/ddr.21026
From in silico target prediction to multi-target drug design: Current databases, methods and applications, Journal of Proteomics, vol.74, issue.12, pp.2554-2574, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.011
Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs, Nature, vol.99, issue.7270, pp.175-181, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature08506
Proteochemometric modeling as a tool to design selective compounds and for extrapolating to novel targets, Med. Chem. Commun., vol.48, issue.1, pp.16-30, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1039/C0MD00165A
In Silico Target Predictions: Defining a Benchmarking Data Set and Comparison of Performance of the Multiclass Na??ve Bayes and Parzen-Rosenblatt Window, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.53, issue.8, pp.53-1957, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci300435j
Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets, Nature, vol.57, issue.7403, pp.361-367, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature11159
Predicting New Indications for Approved Drugs Using a Proteochemometric Method, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.55, issue.15, pp.55-6832, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm300576q
A ligand's-eye view of protein similarity, Nature Methods, vol.2, issue.2, pp.116-117, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nmeth.2339
Chemogenomics: Looking at biology through the lens of chemistry, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, vol.7, issue.5507, pp.149-160, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/sam.10046
Chemogenomics Approaches for Receptor Deorphanization and Extensions of the Chemogenomics Concept to Phenotypic Space, Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol.11, issue.15, pp.1964-1977, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2174/156802611796391230
Computational Methods in Developing Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR): A Review, Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, vol.9, issue.3, pp.213-228, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.2174/138620706776055539
Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development, PLoS ONE, vol.6, issue.11, p.27518, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0027518.s016
Significantly Improved HIV Inhibitor Efficacy Prediction Employing Proteochemometric Models Generated From Antivirogram Data, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.38, issue.3, p.1002899, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002899.s022
Identifying Novel Adenosine Receptor Ligands by Simultaneous Proteochemometric Modeling of Rat and Human Bioactivity Data, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.55, issue.16, pp.55-7010, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm3003069
Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. the report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 52, ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim, vol.33, issue.2, pp.155-173, 2005. ,
Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME???Tox predictions?, Drug Discovery Today, vol.11, issue.15-16, pp.15-16, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.06.013
An overview of advances in reliability estimation of individual predictions in machine learning, IDA, vol.13, issue.2, pp.385-401, 2009. ,
Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models, Molecules, vol.17, issue.12, pp.17-4791, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3390/molecules17054791
Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.50, issue.5, pp.742-754, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci100050t
Data, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.55, issue.11, pp.5165-5173, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm300131x
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/in2p3-01071154
Comparability of Mixed IC50 Data ??? A Statistical Analysis, PLoS ONE, vol.51, issue.4, p.61007, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0061007.s006
QSARs, Data and Error in the Modern Age of Drug Discovery, Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol.12, issue.17, pp.1896-1902 ,
DOI : 10.2174/156802612804547380
Estimating Error Rates in Bioactivity Databases, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.53, issue.10, pp.2499-2505, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci400099q
Healthy skepticism: assessing realistic model performance, Drug Discovery Today, vol.14, issue.7-8, pp.7-8, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.01.012
Beware of q2!, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, vol.20, issue.4, pp.269-276, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1
Predictive Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships Modeling, Handbook of Chemoinformatics Algorithms, vol.33, p.211, 2010. ,
The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models, QSAR & Combinatorial Science, vol.38, issue.1, pp.69-77, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1002/qsar.200390007
Quantitative Structure???Activity Relationship Studies Using Gaussian Processes, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol.41, issue.3, pp.830-835, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci000459c
Gaussian Processes:?? A Method for Automatic QSAR Modeling of ADME Properties, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.47, issue.5, pp.1847-1857, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci7000633
Gaussian Processes for Classification: QSAR Modeling of ADMET and Target Activity, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.50, issue.6, pp.1053-1061, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci900406x
Accurate Solubility Prediction with Error Bars for Electrolytes:?? A Machine Learning Approach, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.47, issue.2, pp.407-424, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci600205g
Gaussian process: an alternative approach for QSAM modeling of peptides, Amino Acids, vol.90, issue.1, pp.199-212, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00726-008-0228-1
Modeling and prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using genetic algorithm-Gaussian processes, Biopolymers, vol.2, issue.6, pp.792-802, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1002/bip.21091
Characterization of the binding profile of peptide to transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) using Gaussian process regression, Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol.41, issue.9, pp.41-865, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.07.004
Navigating the protein fitness landscape with Gaussian processes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.110, issue.3, pp.193-201, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1215251110
Combining On-Chip Synthesis of a Focused Combinatorial Library with Computational Target Prediction Reveals Imidazopyridine GPCR Ligands, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol.23, issue.2, pp.582-585, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1002/anie.201307786
ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research, vol.40, issue.D1, pp.40-1100, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/nar/gkr777
Definition of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Transmembrane Bundle Binding Pocket and Calculation of Receptor Similarities for Drug Design, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.52, issue.14, pp.52-4429, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm900319e
Proteochemometrics analysis of substrate interactions with dengue virus NS3 proteases, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol.16, issue.20, pp.16-9369, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.08.081
Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME, IDrugs, vol.9, issue.3, pp.199-204, 2006. ,
How Similar Are Similarity Searching Methods? A Principal Component Analysis of Molecular Descriptor Space, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.49, issue.1, pp.108-119, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci800249s
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013. ,
New Chemical Descriptors Relevant for the Design of Biologically Active Peptides. A Multivariate Characterization of 87 Amino Acids, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.41, issue.14, pp.41-2481, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm9700575
Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1162/089976602317250933
Classes of kernels for machine learning: a statistics perspective, J. Mach. Learn. Res, vol.2, pp.299-312, 2002. ,
Support Vector Machines and Kernels for Computational Biology, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.14, issue.10, p.1000173, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000173.t002
Schur complements in statistics and probability, The Schur Complement and Its Applications. Numerical Methods and Algorithms, pp.163-226, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/0-387-24273-2_7
Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms, 2003. ,
Bayesian Learning for Neural Network, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0
Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation, Bayesian Analysis, vol.1, issue.4, pp.833-859, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1214/06-BA127
Gaussian processes for machine learning (gpml) toolbox, J. Mach. Learn. Res, vol.11, pp.3011-3015, 2010. ,
Building predictive models in r using the caret package, J. Stat. Softw, vol.28, issue.5, pp.1-26, 2008. ,
kernlab ? An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R, J. Stat. Softw, vol.11, issue.9, pp.1-20, 2004. ,
Infpy package for python. version 0, p.13 ,
Statistical variation in progressive scrambling, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.7, issue.7-9, pp.563-576, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10822-004-4077-z
Design and evaluation of substrate-based octapeptide and non substrate-based tetrapeptide inhibitors of dengue virus NS2B???NS3 proteases, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol.434, issue.4, pp.767-772, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.139
Computational chemogenomics: Is it more than inductive transfer?, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.2, issue.1, pp.1-22, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10822-014-9743-1
Proteochemometric Modeling of the Bioactivity Spectra of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors by Introducing Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprint, PLoS ONE, vol.37, issue.7, p.41698, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0041698.s005
Screening of selective histone deacetylase inhibitors by proteochemometric modeling, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.13, issue.1, p.212, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.09.003
Support Vector Machine Based on Universal Kernel Function and Its Application in Quantitative Structure - Toxicity Relationship Model, 2009 International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, pp.708-711, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1109/IFITA.2009.256
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Similarity???Activity Relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL Similarity Matrices, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.41, issue.14, pp.41-2553, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm970732a
GPCR structure and activation: an essential role for the first extracellular loop in activating the adenosine A2B receptor, The FASEB Journal, vol.25, issue.2, pp.632-643, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1096/fj.10-164319
Importance of the extracellular loops in G protein-coupled receptors for ligand recognition and receptor activation, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol.32, issue.1, pp.35-42, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.tips.2010.10.001
The 2.6 Angstrom Crystal Structure of a Human A2A Adenosine Receptor Bound to an Antagonist, Science, vol.322, issue.5905, pp.1211-1217, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.1164772
Chemical substructures that enrich for biological activity, Bioinformatics, vol.24, issue.21, pp.2518-2525, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn479
The drug designer??s guide to selectivity, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol.83, issue.2, pp.148-156, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.03.003
Study on human GPCR???inhibitor interactions by proteochemometric modeling, Gene, vol.518, issue.1, pp.124-131, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.061
Global Analysis of Small Molecule Binding to Related Protein Targets, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.45, issue.1, p.1002333, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002333.s017
International union of pharmacology. XXV. nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, Pharmacol. Rev, vol.53, issue.4, pp.527-552, 2001. ,
Structure discovery in nonparametric regression through compositional kernel search. ArXiv e-prints 1302, p.4922, 2013. ,
Evolution of Covariance Functions for Gaussian Process Regression Using Genetic Programming, p.3794, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-53856-8_39
Parallelizing gaussian process calculations in R. arXiv e-print 1305, p.4886, 2013. ,
Sparse On-Line Gaussian Processes, Neural Computation, vol.14, issue.3, pp.641-668, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1109/34.735807
A Bayesian Committee Machine, Neural Computation, vol.45, issue.1, pp.2719-2741, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01414873
Proteochemometric modeling of HIV protease susceptibility, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.9, issue.1, p.181, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-9-181
Services for prediction of drug susceptibility for HIV proteases and reverse transcriptases at the HIV drug research centre, Bioinformatics, vol.27, issue.12, pp.1719-1720, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr192