1756-3305-5-831756-3305Research<p>Molecular evidence of <it>Culex pipiens</it> form molestus and hybrids pipiens/molestus in Morocco, North Africa</p>AmraouiFadilaamraoui_fadila@yahoo.frTijaneMhamedtijane@fsr.ac.maSarihMhammedmhammed.sarih@pasteur.maFaillouxAnna-Bellaanna-bella.failloux@pasteur.fr

Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Laboratoire des Maladies Vectorielles, 1 Place Louis Pasteur, Casablanca, 20360, Morocco

Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire de Biochimie et Immunologie, 4 avenue Ibn Battouta, Rabat, BP 1014 RP, Morocco

Institut Pasteur, Department of Virology, Arboviruses and Insect Vectors, 25-28 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, 75724, France

Parasites & Vectors1756-330520125183http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/5/1/8310.1186/1756-3305-5-8322541050
1132012274201227420122012Amraoui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Culex pipiens complexMicrosatelliteMolecular taxonomyMoroccoNorth Africa

Abstract

Background

Culex pipiens L. is the most widespread mosquito vector in temperate regions including North Africa. Cx. pipiens has two recognized forms or biotypes; pipiens and molestus are morphologically indistinguishable with distinct behavior and physiology that may influence their vectorial status. In our study, we prospected for the different forms of Cx. pipiens in Morocco.

Methods

Cx. pipiens larvae were collected in 9 sites throughout Morocco during summer 2010 and reared until imago stage. Cx. pipiens was identified using diagnostic primers designed for the flanking region of microsatellite CQ11.

Results

We established the presence of both forms of Cx. pipiens and their hybrids in Morocco.

Conclusions

Molecular identification provides the first evidence of the presence of Cx. pipiens form molestus in Morocco and hybrids between pipiens and molestus forms in North Africa. The epidemiological implications of our findings are discussed.

Background

The Culex pipiens complex includes several species; Cx. pipiens pipiens Linnaeus, 1758 and Cx. pipiens quinquefasciatus Say, 1823 are the most ubiquitous mosquitoes in temperate and tropical regions, respectively. Cx. p. pipiens has two distinct forms or biotypes: form pipiens and form molestus which are morphologically indistinguishable and differ in physiology and behavior. Cx. pipiens form pipiens is subjected to diapause (heterodynamic), is anautogeneous (only lays eggs after a blood-meal), and eurygamous (unable to mate in confined spaces). On the other hand, Cx. pipiens form molestus Forskal, 1775 does not diapause (homodynamic), is autogeneous (lays first batch of eggs without taking a blood-meal) and stenogamous (mates in confined spaces) 12. In addition, the biotypes molestus and pipiens occupy distinct habitats in Russia and the northeastern United States. Indeed, molestus form occurs in underground areas in urban settings while pipiens form lives aboveground 34. In Europe, sympatric occurrence of both biotypes has been observed in aboveground habitats as well as in underground habitats 567. The two forms did not seem to be genetically isolated and were reported to hybridize in the United States and Europe 678. They have different trophic preferences: pipiens biting mainly birds and molestus feeding on mammals, whereas hybrids exhibit an opportunistic behavior and can readily feed on both hosts. These feeding patterns are thought to influence the transmission of avian and mammalian pathogens.

In North Africa, Cx. p. pipiens is a competent vector of several pathogens infecting animals and humans including West Nile virus 9, Rift Valley Fever virus 101112 and filarial worms 13141516. Based on morphological characters, behavioral and reproductive specializations, the mosquito Cx. p. pipiens was described in the North African region 171819202122232425. Nevertheless, these classical characters present limited value. Therefore, our study aims to identify members of the Cx. pipiens complex present in Morocco based on a molecular identification.

Methods

Mosquitoes were collected as larvae using the “dipping” sampling method during summer 2010 from three Moroccan regions (Figure 1). A total of 9 sites were classified according to the habitat (urban, suburban or rural) and the type of breeding site (aboveground or underground). Fourth instar larvae were used for morphological identification 26 and reared until imago stage at 28 ± 1°C with 80% relative humidity and a 16 h:8 h photoperiod. Emerged adults were conserved at −20°C for subsequent molecular characterization.

<p>Figure 1</p>

Localization of the collection sites in Morocco.

Localization of the collection sites in Morocco.

DNA extraction from F0 individuals was performed using the method of DNAzol as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Specimens were identified as belonging to the Culex pipiens complex using a multiplex PCR assay described in Bahnck and Fonseca (2006) 27. The locus CQ11 was used to distinguish between the two forms of Cx. pipiens. The DNA fragment size amplified varied between pipiens and molestus allowing us to distinguish the two forms in a single PCR reaction (Figure 2). Specimens of Cx. pipiens molestus from Japan were used as control.

<p>Figure 2</p>

Example of PCR amplification of the flanking region of the CQ11 microsatellite ofCulex pipiens collected in an underground site in Casablanca (Morocco).

Example of PCR amplification of the flanking region of the CQ11 microsatellite ofCulex pipienscollected in an underground site in Casablanca (Morocco). DNA was extracted from individual mosquitoes and identified by PCR amplification of the flanking region of the CQ11 microsatellite. Lane M: 100-bp size marker; Lane 1: control Cx. pipiens form molestus from Japan; Lane 2: molestus form; Lane 3: pipiens form; Lane 4: hybrid form.

Results and Discussion

A total of 214 adults were characterized by PCR and frequencies of different forms are represented in Table 1. Overall, 52.3% of adults tested were homozygous for the 200 bp fragment which is characteristic of the pipiens form, 22% were homozygous for the 250 bp fragment identifying the molestus form and the remaining (25.7%) corresponded to hybrids.

<p>Table 1</p>

City

Habitat

Breeding site

Pipiens

Molestus

Hybrids

(Ground)

form (%)

form (%)

(%)

Cx.pipiens larvae were collected at various sites in Morocco, reared to adults and identified by PCR amplification of the flanking region of the CQ11 microsatellite. In brackets, number of tested mosquitoes.

Tanger

Urban

Above

69.6 (16)

8.7 (2)

21.7 (5)

Sub-urban

Above

52.2 (12)

34.8 (8)

13 (3)

Rural

Above

62.5 (15)

8.3 (2)

29.2 (7)

Casablanca/

Urban

Above

31 (9)

17.2 (5)

51.8(15)

Mohammedia

Urban

Under

25 (8)

59.4 (19)

15.6 (5)

Sub-urban

Above

53.6 (15)

17.8 (5)

28.6 (8)

Marrakech

Sub-urban

Above

60.9 (14)

8.7 (2)

30.4 (7)

Rural

Above

78.3 (18)

4.3 (1)

17.4 (4)

Rural

Under

55.6 (5)

33.3 (3)

11.1 (1)

Frequency of forms of theCulex pipienscomplex in Morocco

This study provides the first molecular evidence for the presence of Cx. pipiens form molestus in Morocco and hybrids in North Africa.

The molestus form has been described as a distinct species, Cx. molestus Forskal, 1775 from autogeneous Egyptian specimens. Because Cx. pipiens form molestus is stenogamous and autogenous, it colonizes underground areas in urban settings 3 with limited geographic distribution throughout the world. In our study, Cx. pipiens form pipiens and form molestus were found in urban, suburban and rural habitats. Indistinctly, the two forms co-occur in aboveground and underground breeding sites. Sympatric distribution of the biotypes molestus and pipiens in surface breeding sites has been observed in southern Europe and the United States 568 and in underground breeding sites in North Europe 7.

Conclusions

Until now, hybrids were mainly reported in the United States 48 and South Europe 6. Our findings corroborate the presence of hybrids in all breeding sites sampled. Hybrids between molestus and pipiens forms are considered of great epidemiological importance. They exhibit intermediate physiological and behavioral traits 28 and can readily feed on avian and mammalian hosts 829. This opportunistic biting behavior will potentiate the role of Cx. pipiens as a bridge-vector for the transmission of pathogens such as West Nile virus, from birds (amplification hosts) to humans 830.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’contributions

FA carried out mosquito genotyping, contributed to the interpretation of results and drafted the manuscript. MT participated in the design of experiments. MS participated in the design of experiments and mosquito collections. ABF designed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Laurence Mousson for technical help. FA was supported by the “Division Internationale” of the Institut Pasteur. This work was funded by the Institut Pasteur (ACIP grant A-08-2009) and the European Commission Framework Program Seven Award “InfraVec”.

<p>Culex (Culex) molestus Forskal (Diptera: Culicidae): Neotype designation, description, variation, and taxonomic status</p>HarbachREHarrisonBAGadAMProc Entomol Soc Wash198486521542<p>Culex (Culex) pipiens Linnaeus (Diptera, Culicidae) - concepts, type designations, and description</p>HarbachREDahlCWhiteGBProc Entomol Soc Wash198587124<p>Culex pipiens in London Underground tunnels: differentiation between surface and subterranean populations</p>ByrneKNicholsRAHeredity199982-15<p>Genetic insights into the population structure of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Northeastern United States by using microsatellite analysis</p>HuangSMolaeiGAndreadisTGAmJTrop Med Hyg200879518527<p>Commensalism, adaptation and gene flow: mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex in different habitats</p>ChevillonCEritjaRPasteurNRaymondMGenet Res19956614715710.1017/S00166723000344928522156<p>Asymmetric introgression between sympatric molestus and pipiens forms of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Comporta region, Portugal</p>GomesBSousaCANovoMTFreitasFBAlvesRCôrte-RealARSalgueiroPDonnellyMJAlmeidaAPPintoJBMC Evol Biol2009926210.1186/1471-2148-9-262277865519895687<p>First evidence for presence of Culex pipiens biotype molestus in the Netherlands, and of hybrid biotype pipiens and molestus in northern Europe</p>ReuskenCBEMde VriesABuijsJBraksMAHden HartogWScholteEJJ Vector Ecol20103521021210.1111/j.1948-7134.2010.00080.x20618670<p>Emerging vectors in the Culex pipiens complex</p>FonsecaDMKeyghobadiNMalcolmCAMehmetCSchaffnerFMogiMFleischerRCWilkersonRCScience20043031535153810.1126/science.109424715001783<p>Assessment of the risk of introduction to Tunisia of the Rift Valley fever virus by the mosquito Culex pipiens</p>KridaGDiancourtLBouattourARhimAChermitiBFaillouxABBull Soc Pathol Exot201110425025910.1007/s13149-010-0122-421184293<p>The Rift Valley fever epizootic in Egypt 1977–78. 2. Ecological and entomological studies</p>HoogstraalHMeeganJMKhalilGMAdhamFKTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19797362462910.1016/0035-9203(79)90005-144038<p>Experimental transmission and field isolation studies implicating Culex pipiens as a vector of Rift Valley fever virus in Egypt</p>MeeganJMKhalilGMHoogstraalHAdhamFKAmJTrop Med Hyg19802914051410<p>Potential vectors of Rift Valley fever virus in the Mediterranean Region</p>MoutaillerSKridaGSchaffnerFVazeilleMFaillouxABVector Borne Zoonot Dis2008874975310.1089/vbz.2008.0009<p>The resurgence of lymphatic filariasis in the Nile Delta</p>HarbMFarisRGadAMHafezONRamziRBuckAABull WHO199371495423934208440037<p>Variability among Tunisian populations of Culex pipiens: genetic structure and susceptibility to a filarial parasite, Brugia pahangi</p>KridaGBouattourARodhainFFaillouxABParasitol Res1998841391429493214<p>Spatial distribution and abundance of culicine mosquitoes in relation to the risk of filariasis transmission in El Sharqiya Governorate, Egypt</p>Abdel-HamidYMSolimanMIAllamKMEgypt Acad J Biolog Sci200913948<p>Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to the risk of disease transmission in El Ismailia governorate, Egypt</p>Abdel-HamidYMSolimanMIkenawyMAJ Egypt Soc Parasitol20114110911821634247<p>Le pouvoir autogène chez le biotype nord-africain du moustique commun Culex pipiens (L.)</p>RoubaudEBull Soc Path Exot193936172175<p>A morphological and biological study of Culex pipiens in the Cairo area of Egypt</p>KnightKLMalekAABull Soc Fouad I Entomol195135175185<p>Notes biogéographiques sur les Culicidés du Maroc</p>GaudJArch Inst Pasteur Maroc19534443490<p>Nouvelle contribution à l’étude du complexe Culex pipiens en Tunisie</p>VermeilCBull Soc Pathol Exot195447841843RiouxJALes culicidés du “midi” méditerranéenLechevalier, Paris1958<p>A propos de Culex pipiens en Algérie</p>SenevetGAndarelliLGraellsRArch Inst Pasteur Algérie1958367074<p>Présence du caractère autogène chez Culex pipiens pipiens L. dans un biotope épigé de l’Ile de Djerba</p>RiouxJAJuminerBKchoukMCrosetHArch Inst Pasteur Tunis19654218<p>Nouvelle mention, pour le “Midi” méditerranéen, de populations naturelles anautogènes et sténogames de Culex pipiens pipiens L</p>PasteurNRiouxJAGuilvardEPech-PerièresJAnn Parasitol Hum Comp197752205210907293<p>Les Culicidae du Maroc: clés d’identification, avec données biologiques et écologiques</p>HimmiODakkiMTrariBEl AgbaniMATrav Inst Sci, Série Zool Rabat19954451BrunhesJRhaimAGeoffroyBAngelGHervyJPLes moustiques de l’Afrique méditerranéenne. Logiciel d’identification et d’enseignementIRD & IPT, CD-Rom collection didactique, Éditions IRD, Montpellier, France2000<p>Rapid assay to identify the two genetic forms of Culex (Culex) pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) and hybrid populations</p>BahnkCMFonsecaDMAmJTrop Med Hyg200675251255<p>Structure and seasonality of Nearctic Culex pipiens populations</p>SpielmanAAnn NY Acad Sci200195122023411797779<p>Genetic influences on mosquito feeding behavior and the emergence of zoonotic pathogens</p>KilpatrickAMKramerLDJonesMJMarraPPDaszakPFonsecaDMAmJTrop Med Hyg200777667671<p>Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): a bridge vector of West Niles Virus to humans</p>HamerGLKitronUDBrawnJDLossSRRuizMOGoldbergTLWalkerEDJ Med Entomol20084512512810.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[125:CPDCAB]2.0.CO;218283952