Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Journal articles

The use of microbead-based spoligotyping for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to evaluate the quality of the conventional method: Providing guidelines for Quality Assurance when working on membranes

Edgar Abadia 1 Jian Zhang 1 Viviana Ritacco 2 Kristin Kremer 3 Raymond Ruimy 4 Leen Rigouts 5 Harrison Magdinier Gomes 6 Atiná Ribeiro Elias 6 Maryse Fauville-Dufaux 7 Karolien Stoffels 7 Voahangy Rasolofo-Razanamparany 8 Darío Garcia de Viedma 9, 10 Marta Herranz 9, 10 Sahal Al-Hajoj 11 Nalin Rastogi 12 Carlo Garzelli 13 Enrico Tortoli 14 Philip Suffys 6 Dick van Soolingen 3, 15 Guislaine Refrégier 1 Christophe Sola 1, 16, * 
Abstract : Background
The classical spoligotyping technique, relying on membrane reverse line-blot hybridization of the spacers of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis CRISPR locus, is used world-wide (598 references in Pubmed on April 8th, 2011). However, until now no inter-laboratory quality control study had been undertaken to validate this technique. We analyzed the quality of membrane-based spoligotyping by comparing it to the recently introduced and highly robust microbead-based spoligotyping. Nine hundred and twenty-seven isolates were analyzed totaling 39,861 data points. Samples were received from 11 international laboratories with a worldwide distribution.
The high-throughput microbead-based Spoligotyping was performed on CTAB and thermolyzate DNA extracted from isolated Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) strains coming from the genotyping participating centers. Information regarding how the classical Spoligotyping method was performed by center was available. Genotype discriminatory analyses were carried out by comparing the spoligotypes obtained by both methods. The non parametric U-Mann Whitney homogeneity test and the Spearman rank correlation test were performed to validate the observed results.
Seven out of the 11 laboratories (63 %), perfectly typed more than 90% of isolates, 3 scored between 80-90% and a single center was under 80% reaching 51% concordance only. However, this was mainly due to discordance in a single spacer, likely having a non-functional probe on the membrane used. The centers using thermolyzate DNA performed as well as centers using the more extended CTAB extraction procedure. Few centers shared the same problematic spacers and these problematic spacers were scattered over the whole CRISPR locus (Mostly spacers 15, 14, 18, 37, 39, 40).
We confirm that classical spoligotyping is a robust method with generally a high reliability in most centers. The applied DNA extraction procedure (CTAB or thermolyzate) did not affect the results in this study. However performance was center-dependent, suggesting that training is a key component in quality assurance of spoligotyping. Overall, no particular spacer yielded a higher degree of deviating results, suggesting that errors occur randomly either in the process of re-using membranes, or during the reading of the results and transferring of data from the film to a digital file. Last, the performance of the microbead-based method was excellent as previously shown by Cowan et al. (J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004) and Zhang et al. (J. Med. Microbiol. 2009) and demonstrated the proper detection of spacer 15 that is known to occasionally give weak signals in the classical spoligotyping.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Ed. BMC Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 5:07:59 PM
Last modification on : Monday, October 17, 2022 - 1:37:47 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, November 22, 2012 - 12:45:58 PM



Edgar Abadia, Jian Zhang, Viviana Ritacco, Kristin Kremer, Raymond Ruimy, et al.. The use of microbead-based spoligotyping for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to evaluate the quality of the conventional method: Providing guidelines for Quality Assurance when working on membranes. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2011, 11 (1), pp.110. ⟨10.1186/1471-2334-11-110⟩. ⟨pasteur-00670610⟩



Record views


Files downloads